I liked this comment, that the media judged Trump to have won the debate before it started. May represent a very low bar, “managed to get to the venue in time” or “did not fuck it up completely.” From the rest of the world, please, those in the US, please actually listen to what your candidates are really saying before you vote.
More on the presidential debate for Quartz:
That is the difference between skepticism and nihilism. The latter is what some elite journalists did by declaring Trump the winner before he opened his mouth. That is a capitulation to incompetence, the bestowing of a free pass to man known for bigotry and hate-mongering, and a show of naiveté toward Trump’s mastery of spin, which he wields as staunchly as Clinton does facts. Reactions like Todd’s and Brooks’ show that Trump has not lost his touch, as they responded by pandering to the standard of expectations set in part by Trump’s own campaign.
Trump did, however, lose the debate. Because the debate existed in its own realm, free from selective edits and crowd feedback, divorced—in the moment at least—from “post-fact” punditry manipulation. The candidates had to speak candidly. They had to react on the spot. They had to argue their case on…
View original post 97 more words